FriEnt - Working Group on Development and Peace
 

Publications - Detail

 

Tipping point? Palestinians and the search for a new strategy
Middle East Report No 95
International crisis group | 2010

Country: Nahost
To those familiar with the rhythms of Israeli-Palestinian negotiation, this has been a year of surprises. Palestinians, suffering most from the status quo, so most in need of a resolution, balk at resuming talks even as Israel expresses eagerness. In Obama, they have a president more willing to engage and to confront Israel, yet they have denied him the chance to advance talks. Seventeen years after Oslo, the best he can do is get the parties to talk indirectly – and even then, not without overcoming huge Palestinian reluctance. What is going on? The Palestinian approach may seem tactically suspect or politically self-defeating but is not without logic. It is rooted in almost two decades of unsuccessful U.S.-sponsored bilateral negotiations and manifested in embryonic efforts to change the balance of power with Israel. It is premature to speak of a new Palestinian strategy but not to respond and rectify past flaws. After an often perplexing, ineffective start, the U.S. seems poised for a more fundamental policy review involving the presentation of American ideas to resolve the conflict. Done right and at the right time, it would be welcome.

download [pdf-file, 50 S., 1,37 MB]

Edit  |  Delete

 

Contact
Imprint
Deutsch

Federal Ministry for Economic Cooperation and Development (BMZ) | Deutsche Gesellschaft für Technische Zusammenarbeit (GTZ) GmbH | Church Development Service (EED) | Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung (FES) | Heinrich-Böll-Stiftung (hbs) | Misereor / Catholic Central Agency for Development Aid | Civil Peace Service Group (CPS) | German Platform for Peaceful Conflict Management / Institute for Development and Peace (INEF)